A free service by Scientific Network Management s-n-m.eu ↗
Funding Radar

Enhancing ecodesign and circularity of construction products

eu HORIZON-CL6-2027-01-CIRCBIO-02 · Horizon Europe (HORIZON)

Statusforthcoming
Opens20 Apr 2027
Deadline22 Sep 2027 — 375 days
ActionHORIZON Innovation Actions
Official pagehttps://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunit…
Fetched2026-09-11 04:00:47+00:00

You are reading one call. 1,383 are open right now.

A search matches words. It cannot know what your institution works on. Give the name and every open call is ranked against it — this one included.

Free · no account · nothing stored that identifies you

Scope

Expected Outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: material and product manufacturers apply ecodesign principles in developing and manufacturing products that are safe and contribute significantly to EU climate, zero pollution, circular economy, and biodiversity goals, e.g., through biodiversity-enhancing circular design; consumers and professionals benefit from more sustainable and circular products, i.e. durable, safe, reliable, reusable, reparable, upgradable, recyclable products including increased recycled content. Scope: Construction is one of the most resource-intensive sectors of the economy. The construction sector is responsible for almost 39% of the EU’s total waste generation. [1] Greenhouse gas emissions from material extraction, manufacturing of construction products, construction and renovation of buildings are estimated at 5-12% of total national GHG emissions. [2] Greater material efficiency could save 80% of those emissions. [3] Cement, steel, aluminium and plastics are the materials contributing by 15% to EU carbon emissions. Proposals should: develop, test and demonstrate new and improved ecodesign of construction materials and products, including design for durability, reusability, reparability, separability, recyclability, and uptake of recycled content. Solutions promoting assembly and disassembly of products should be considered, and solutions for the reuse of recovered materials; assess and provide recommendations for mechanisms and incentives to reward design for circularity, disassembly, and product durability – such as extended guarantees, VAT reduction, and others –, and analyse potential trade-offs and propose solutions to overcome them. The environmental performance of the proposed solutions in comparison to existing products should be evaluated from a lifecycle perspective using product environmental footprint methodology wherever applicable. The possible presence of contaminants in construction products and waste and its impact on circularity must be taken into account. Reuse and recycling options should involve quality control and assessment. Proposals should seek to contribute to the goals of the New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative. Joint activities with NEB projects are encouraged. Proposals should also seek to build synergies with construction-focused projects funded under Clusters 6 and 4, and are strongly encouraged to organise joint activities, ensure synergies and undertake clustering activities with those. Participation of partners from (associated) countries…

What consortia for this call have looked like

2 projects have been funded under this line (HORIZON-CL6-CIRCBIO-02) in Horizon Europe and H2020. This is what they were made of — not a recommendation, just what the Commission signed.

15partners, typically
range 10–15
7countries per consortium
10 seen across all of them
25organisations in total
across those projects

The mix of organisations

9 companies
6 research organisations
6 other organisations
4 universities

Who coordinated them

Coordinating an EU project is a demanding, specific job. These organisations have done it on this topic line before.

Technische Universitat Berlin · DE Asociacion Empresarial De Investigacion Centro · ES

This is the shape, not the consortium. It says how many partners these projects had and what kinds of organisation were in them. It does not know whether your idea needs the same mix, who is available, who is already committed elsewhere, or how the work and the budget should be divided. Those are judgement calls on a specific proposal, and no amount of public data answers them.

Building the actual consortium — finding the partners, agreeing the roles, and writing it so it survives an evaluation — is what Scientific Network Management does. Free either way; the radar does not change if you never ask.

Found one worth pursuing?

Finding the call is the easy half. Scientific Network Management is the grant-writing practice behind this radar — 13 years of writing and managing EU-funded research projects, including two EuropeAid technical assistance contracts building biotechnology centres in Türkiye as Team Leader.

Proposal writingHorizon Europe, EU4Health, EuropeAid. Concept to submission, or a review of a draft you already have.
Consortium buildingFinding and approaching the partners a call requires, and holding the consortium together through drafting.
Project managementRunning the project after the award — reporting, deliverables, coordination, audits.

Talk to us What SNM does No obligation, and nothing here is conditional on using us — the radar stays free and complete either way.