A free service by Scientific Network Management s-n-m.eu ↗
Funding Radar

Pillar III: Promoting public engagement in R&I and scientific literacy

eu HORIZON-WIDERA-2027-05-ERA-04 · Horizon Europe (HORIZON)

Statusforthcoming
Opens08 Dec 2026
Deadline11 Mar 2027 — 179 days
ActionHORIZON Coordination and Support Actions
Official pagehttps://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunit…
Fetched2026-09-12 04:00:03+00:00

You are reading one call. 1,385 are open right now.

A search matches words. It cannot know what your institution works on. Give the name and every open call is ranked against it — this one included.

Free · no account · nothing stored that identifies you

Scope

Scope: This topic aims to promote the adoption of ERA policies and practices delivering innovative approaches for enhancing science-society links and promoting scientific literacy. Proposals should contribute to the impact “Increasing trust in science and alignment of R&I with society’s needs, expectations and values”, thereby enhancing the democratic character and impact of science in the ERA. Applicants should select and clearly identify one area being addressed, choosing from the two areas outlined below. Both areas are designed to contribute towards the implementation of the ERA Structural Policy “Enhancing Trust in Science through Citizen Participation, Engagement and Science Communication”. Proposals should develop the activities outlined for the selected area and propose additional activities that contribute to achieving the expected outcomes. Project activities should reach large communities of stakeholders ensuring a wide geographical coverage, inclusivity, broad participation, and accessibility over the course of the project. Including stakeholders outside academia may be considered, for example, through citizen science. Proposals should describe their target group in terms of its scope and size. In project activities, particular attention should be paid to promoting inclusive gender equality and addressing gender-specific challenges where relevant. Expected project duration is up to 3 years without prejudice to a longer duration if justified. Area 1: Youth, science and democracy Expected outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: Innovative ways for engaging young people in science and promoting scientific literacy; Common ERA approaches in engaging and communicating with young people in relation to R&I. Scope: Society increasingly faces complex problems that require citizens to have the capacity to participate in processes incorporating scientific analysis with deliberation about societal goals. In particular, involving young people in participatory scientific activities aimed at tackling social challenges fosters their scientific skills and scientific literacy. At the same time, it allows them to develop their civic and democratic skills, as civic engagement and scientific practice share characteristics like understanding systems, considering alternative explanations, and debating critically within a community. Area 1 promotes innovative ways to effectively and inclusively engage and involve young people in R&I. Additionally, it invites public engagement and science communication practition…

What consortia for this call have looked like

2 projects have been funded under this line (HORIZON-WIDERA-ERA-04) in Horizon Europe and H2020. This is what they were made of — not a recommendation, just what the Commission signed.

11partners, typically
range 7–11
8countries per consortium
12 seen across all of them
18organisations in total
across those projects

The mix of organisations

9 universities
4 research organisations
4 companies
1 other organisation

Who coordinated them

Coordinating an EU project is a demanding, specific job. These organisations have done it on this topic line before.

Universitetet I Oslo · NO Univerzita Karlova · CZ

This is the shape, not the consortium. It says how many partners these projects had and what kinds of organisation were in them. It does not know whether your idea needs the same mix, who is available, who is already committed elsewhere, or how the work and the budget should be divided. Those are judgement calls on a specific proposal, and no amount of public data answers them.

Building the actual consortium — finding the partners, agreeing the roles, and writing it so it survives an evaluation — is what Scientific Network Management does. Free either way; the radar does not change if you never ask.

Found one worth pursuing?

Finding the call is the easy half. Scientific Network Management is the grant-writing practice behind this radar — 13 years of writing and managing EU-funded research projects, including two EuropeAid technical assistance contracts building biotechnology centres in Türkiye as Team Leader.

Proposal writingHorizon Europe, EU4Health, EuropeAid. Concept to submission, or a review of a draft you already have.
Consortium buildingFinding and approaching the partners a call requires, and holding the consortium together through drafting.
Project managementRunning the project after the award — reporting, deliverables, coordination, audits.

Talk to us What SNM does No obligation, and nothing here is conditional on using us — the radar stays free and complete either way.