Tackling child poverty and ensuring disadvantaged children's access to Early Childhood Education and Care
eu HORIZON-CL2-2026-01-TRANSFO-03 · Horizon Europe (HORIZON)
| Status | open |
|---|---|
| Opens | 12 May 2026 |
| Deadline | 23 Sep 2026 — 27 days |
| Action | HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions |
| Official page | https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunit… |
| Fetched | 2026-08-27 04:00:03+00:00 |
Scope
Expected Outcome: Projects should contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: Policymakers gain insights into the cost of child poverty and the returns from securing access of disadvantaged children to quality Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in the EU. Policymakers receive operational advice on ways to reduce this cost and support participation of disadvantaged children in quality ECEC to close the gap with other children in the EU. Scope: Past studies researched the cost of child poverty, and the returns yielded by and ways to secure disadvantaged children’s participation to ECEC, yet their relevance to the current EU context is limited (i.e. most of them were conducted outside of the EU or they are now outdated). Producing EU-specific insights on these issues is the aim of this topic, which should help close the ECEC participation gap and improve social outcomes, in line with the European Pillar of Social Rights, while fostering fiscal sustainability and inclusive growth. The proposals may: Define disadvantaged children, by going beyond monetary aspects of disadvantages, building on the EU’s concept of risk of poverty or social exclusion, and taking into account systemically marginalised groups. Estimate the cost of child poverty and the returns yielded by participation to quality ECEC by taking into account: children’s needs and effective benefits targeting them, the short and longer-term costs/returns, the economic, social, wellbeing and educational aspects of these costs/returns, children’s, parents’ and aggregate outcomes. Investigate barriers preventing disadvantaged children from accessing quality ECEC. Provide a mapping of the most efficient policies to reduce child poverty cost, comparing ECEC policies’ value for money with other policies. Develop evidence-based and operational policy advice, including ways to better account for these costs/returns in policymaking and good (established or innovative) practices to close the ECEC participation gap. Scalability of these practices may be addressed. Use research methodologies of relevance (qualitative and quantitative, including experimental ones), building on multidisciplinary insights (including from SSH disciplines), and either make use of existing datasets (including administrative datasets), or collect new data. Experts by experience (i.e. vulnerable children and parents) may be involved.
Finding the call is the easy half. Scientific Network Management is the grant-writing practice behind this radar — 13 years of writing and managing EU-funded research projects, including two EuropeAid technical assistance contracts building biotechnology centres in Türkiye as Team Leader.
Talk to us What SNM does No obligation, and nothing here is conditional on using us — the radar stays free and complete either way.
What consortia for this call have looked like
3 projects
have been funded under this line
(HORIZON-CL2-TRANSFO-03) in Horizon Europe and H2020. This is what they
were made of — not a recommendation, just what the Commission signed.
range 9–12
15 seen across all of them
across those projects
The mix of organisations
Who coordinated them
Coordinating an EU project is a demanding, specific job. These organisations have done it on this topic line before.
This is the shape, not the consortium. It says how many partners these projects had and what kinds of organisation were in them. It does not know whether your idea needs the same mix, who is available, who is already committed elsewhere, or how the work and the budget should be divided. Those are judgement calls on a specific proposal, and no amount of public data answers them.
Building the actual consortium — finding the partners, agreeing the roles, and writing it so it survives an evaluation — is what Scientific Network Management does. Free either way; the radar does not change if you never ask.
Who else works on this
Tell us where you are based and this will show which institutions publish on this call's subject in countries that can take part, and whether you have already co-authored with any of them.
Nothing is stored about you — we log the institution searched for, never the visitor.